Infra-sound in the Blues

Disclaimer – many researchers have experienced and discussed what they assume to be infra-sound associated with sasquatch encounters.  I am not knowledgeable enough on the subject of infra-sound nor do I have scientific evidence to prove what I experienced on the evening of the 18th of July, 2010 in the Blue Mountains of southeastern Washington State. With that in mind I will attempt to relate what I experienced.

——————————————————————————————————————

While on an expedition in the Washington Cascades I mentioned to Kevin Jones that I was going to camp in the Blue Mountains near where Paul Freeman had procured a possible sasquatch video. Vance Orchard wrote two volumes about bigfoot in this area, ” Bigfoot of the Blues” in 1993 and  ”Walla Walla Bigfoot” in 2001. Kevin reminded me that the Blues was where he had experienced several infra-sound episodes.  I asked if he would mind sharing with me his campsite location as I would like to camp there.  He showed me on a map the exact location and I entered it into my GPS.

I would guess that I was a little nervous as I drove up to the campsite. Part of the dirt road was so steep that I slipped my Jeep Rubicon into low 4-wheel drive to finish the climp. My ancestors had traveled to Oregon on the Oregon Trail in 1880 and eventually settled in the Blues on the Oregon side. I have often wondered if there were stories of the original pioneers that had been whispered but never written down.

General location of one section of the Blue Mountains that straddles the Washington-Oregon line. On the map one can see the little settlement of Promise that my great-great-grandfather helped found in pioneer days.

At the campsite overlooking the Mill Creek Watershed Area that is “off-limits” to protect the water supply for Walla Walla, Washington.

Several different types of signs that warn the public to stay out! The watershed is the area Paul Freeman had been hired to patrol by the Forest Service when he had his first bigfoot sighting.

The opposite side of the road looking into much denser stands of pines.

(photo taken back home showing the external loud speakers)

I would be spending the night in my Jeep Rubicon specially outfitted with outdoor speakers and an extra stereo and amplifier system. When I arrived around 4 p.m. I was excited that the site afforded both an open expanse into the watershed as well as a heavier wooded area on the opposite of the road. If anything was going to approach during the night it had plenty of cover to do so.

I walked several miles up and down the dusty road looking for prints and hopefully making my presence known to any of the local inhabitants. While walking a side by side ATV came speeding through. The driver, an older gentleman did not look too friendly as he drove by.  About an hour later the ATV was coming back and I positioned myself so that he might stop and talk. He slowed to a stop and I could see that it was probably one of the local ranchers. I asked if the road continued on through (as the topo map suggested). He said no, there was a gate around the corner and I was on private property. He stated that he and his wife had gone about a mile further and checked a pond where they found cougar and black bear tracks.

The wife was more friendly and inquired as to what I was doing. I explained that I was doing audio recording and she asked if it was for wolves as just across the border wolves have been taking livestock in Wallowa County, Oregon.  I answered no I was actually attempting to record sasquatch vocalizations. She laughed nervously and stated that she didn’t believe they existed. I replied that lots of tracks had been found in the Blues. At that the husband looked up and stated that several years ago he had seen an 8 feet tall hairy upright walking animal cross the road kind of slouched over.  He said the next day several dozen cars had come out and were making casts of footprints.

It turns out that I did have a recording of the conversation, however the microphones were a hundred feet away so the quality is poor.

Click here: Blue Mt sighting

I asked him if he had reported it and he said no and that he had no desire to.

It turns out that both the road I was on and the property where I was camping belonged to the Forest Service and I had every right to be there.

The roads had a deep accumulation of dust that made looking for footprints easier.

I continued with my plan. As the sun was not quite down I picked up an electronic megaphone and pointed it towards the deep canyons of the Watershed.  The sound echoed across the vast expanse but I heard nothing.  I did this three times and leaned up against the jeep. Several minutes passed and I started to feel a slight tingling all over. I thought ‘Well if this is what infra-sound feels like they must be quite a distance away.’  I could not see or hear anything unusual, although the rancher’s wife did comment on how my dog kept starring into the woods across the road.

Several minutes later I retreated to the safety (however futile) of the Jeep. I watched as the sun went down and waited until 9:15 p.m. and it was close to dark. Then I used my iPod Touch to play three Tahoe Screams through the outdoor speakers and the extra stereo and amplifier system.  I had my audio recorder running. One microphone was placed about 40 feet from me overlooking the Watershed and another microphone was placed on the top of the jeep to hopefully record anything that approached.  Kevin Jones had told me that this area was very quiet as to vocals so I did not really expect to hear anything.

I lay there several minutes and not hearing anything I quickly fell asleep. It seemed that I had only been asleep about an hour when I felt something that is difficult for me to describe. It started on my left side and quickly spread throughout my body. It did not feel electrical but mechanical. Sort of like laying on a vibrating bed or someone placing a large hand vibrator against my side. But the vibrations were internal, it felt like it was uniform throughout my whole body. It is hard to recall but it seemed to last maybe 30 seconds and stop for about 10 seconds. It would start up again. I think this happened about four times. My only thoughts were ‘well, be careful what you wish for.” I did not feel anxious, or have any fear. After it stopped I slept very soundly and did not wake up until it started to get light around 5:00 a.m. My dog did not have any reactions.

I walked up and down the road looking for tracks but could find none. The road towards the timber was moister, there was no dust and it would have been easy for something to cross the road without leaving an imprint.

Later that day I spoke with Kevin and related to him my experience. Some of the details were not what I expected.  Kevin responded “Stan, I don’t tell people completely what the experience feels like so that when they tell me their experience is, it can be compared to my own.” That way one’s imaginations can not run rampant and come up with something that didn’t really happen.

I have listened to my recordings but need to review them again.

I did find one possible wood-knock at around 12:15 a.m.

Click here: Possible wood-knock

Conclusion – it is certainly a new experience for me. I don’t have any answers.  And I try not to figure out why, if this is a sasquatch, what is their purpose? Is it to intimidate? Or is it simply to immobilize so that they approach the camp, look around, investigate and not be seen?

You can never get totally away from civilization, I found this church bulletin laying half buried in the road.

Sasquatch Phonetic Alphabet

One of the most important developments in the last couple of years is the research of R.Scott Nelson, retired Navy linguist.

Scott has spoken at several conferences and  has been the guest on at least two bigfoot internet radio shows. These can be listened to here:

Bigfoot Quest

Nitecallers

Scott recently sent out documents for other researchers to post.

================================================================================

Fm: R. Scott Nelson

To: Sasquatch Research Community

Re: Sasquatch Phonetic Alphabet (SPA) (attached)

Since I became involved in Sasquatch research a little over two years ago, I have received dozens of e-mails from around the country involving first-hand witness accounts, many containing recorded audio files, of perceived Sasquatch Language. Virtually all of these have included an attempt to spell out Sasquatch “words” using Standard English. This is of little value to the language researcher, since English is notoriously non-phonetic and is subject to widely-varied local dialects.

Since our ultimate goal is the recovery of Sasquatch Language, I have found it necessary to establish a phonetic alphabet and transcription standard (based on the transcription of the Berry/Morehead tapes), by which the contrast and comparison of all future suspected language can be facilitated.

To this end, as an invaluable tool in the future of Sasquatch Language research, I am requesting that the attached standard be published on research web-sites and that it be copied and distributed freely. With this, I am also requesting that local investigators begin using this alphabet as soon as possible to accurately document any perceived Sasquatch Language.

This standard should not be limited to first-hand witness accounts or recordings from North America, but should be used by investigators world-wide, since most languages have many of the same non-phonetic characteristics as English. The work is written in the style of a military SOP (Standard Operating Procedure).

It is my belief that there is nothing more important, at this early stage of Sasquatch Language study, than to standardize the documentation of evidence.

With highest regard for all those engaged in the work of Sasquatch recognition;

R. Scott Nelson

20 June 2010

================================================================================

Sasquatch Phonetic Alphabet . and Transcription Standard

Submitted by R. Scott Nelson

The Sasquatch Phonetic Alphabet (SPA) will alternately be known by the more formal denomination, Unclassified Hominid Phonetic Alphabet (UHPA), until such time as the subject Being is scientifically classified, or documented linguistic contact has been established. “Sasquatch” is used here as a generally accepted term for the subject Being. A variation of the English Reformed Phonetic Alphabet is used, as transcribed from the Berry/Morehead Tapes (BMT).

The existence of the Sasquatch Being is hereby assumed, since any creature must exist before his language. Any argument for the existence of Sasquatch or his language should be given outside of this standard and outside any transcription endeavor that uses this standard. Transcripts should stand alone as tools for the language researcher; whereas SPA transcripts and excerpts should be freely used in other works to support linguistic arguments.

The purpose of this is to standardize all future transcription of suspected Sasquatch Language and to facilitate comparison of language articulations by future researchers; the ultimate goal being the recovery of Sasquatch Language.

Sasquatch Language is spoken approximately twice as fast as any known language in most analyzed recordings, therefore it must be slowed down to be transcribed accurately. 50% of real-time will be the standard; transcription at any other speed will be noted, e.g. (75%). Real-time will be noted as (rt). Tape-time hacks will be given as minute:second.1/100thsecond, e.g. 17:23.54.

Since this is an unknown language, transcribed for the first time, the grammar and syntax of it, likewise, cannot be known. Therefore, to differentiate between small and capital letters is useless and misleading. Sasquatch articulations will be transcribed using capital letters, human voices are to be transcribed by the standards of the language that is spoken (proper English, Russian, etc.). This eases reading of the transcripts when human and Sasquatch voices are mixed or alternating. Since words cannot be known, and only suspected in cognates, Sasquatch utterances will be given as individual morphemes (or syllables). An umlaut (Ä) is used rather than a macron (-) to avoid confusion with the English use of the same symbol.

Small letters within parenthesis will be used, in accordance with military transcription standards, to abbreviate specific notes, e.g. (2-3m) to mean (two or three words or morphemes are missing or inaudible here). Untranscribable vocalizations such as grunts or screams will be noted with capital letters within parenthesis, e.g. (G) or (SC). An abbreviation key follows the phonetics key.

Any document using this alphabet should be labeled (SPA) or (UHPA).

Use in first-hand witness accounts:

This alphabet is not intended to be used solely for the transcription of recorded language, but will be highly useful in first-hand witness accounts of Sasquatch phenomena where the witness perceived spoken language. Researchers, when documenting witness accounts, should endeavor to transcribe each Sasquatch utterance as accurately as possible using this alphabet. As an invaluable aid to the language researcher, several questions should be asked of the witness to correlate with the utterances of the Sasquatch Being:

What was occurring at the moment of each specific utterance?

How many Sasquatch Beings do you believe were present; how many were speaking?

Did you feel that the Sasquatch Beings were speaking to each other or to you (the witness)?

What do you think the Being was trying to communicate?

What do you feel was the emotional state of the Being (for each specific utterance)?

Was there interrogative inflection in the utterance (did it sound like a question)?

Was there imperative or command inflection in the utterance (did it sound like the Being was telling you or another Sasquatch to do or not do something)?

___

This alphabet is expected to grow as additional verified recordings of Sasquatch Language are collected and analyzed, and new extra-human articulations are documented. For example; the well-documented howls, whoops, growls, screams and whistles of Sasquatch may someday be found to have linguistic meaning; wood- and rock-knocking or tooth-popping may be found to be encoded. It should not be discounted that manipulated tree, limb and stick formations could be graphic expressions of Sasquatch Language, much like runic or pictographic human writing systems.

Since auditory perception is subject to the same limitations of all human perception, review and revision of any transcript by other qualified Crypto-Linguists or voice- transcription experts should be welcomed. With the recovery of Sasquatch Language being the anticipated outcome, cooperation and consensus between language researchers should be the first rule of this study.

The first two pages of Berry Tape I transcription are attached as an example of the prescribed usage of this alphabet.

Phoneme Key

Ä = a in father

A = a in can

B = b in bib

D = d in did

Ë = a in make

E = e in set

F = f in fife

G = g in gag

H = h in ham

Ï = i in machine, ee in meet

I = i in sit

J = y in yes, i in union

K = k in kite, c in cut

L = l in lull

M = m in mom

N = n in nine

Ö = o in lone

O = o in log

P = p in pipe

R = r in roar

Rr = rolled r, as in Spanish or in Scottish Brogue

S = s in sister

T = t in tight

Ü = u in plume, oo in boot

U = u in run, o in union

V = v in verve

W = w in way

Y = oo in book

Z = z in zebra, s in is

′ = glottal stop

c = tongue click, not evident in BMT

> = phoneme drawn out

Compound Phonemes

ÄÏ = i in like, y in my

JÜ = as in you, u in fume

KH = ch in Scottish loch, x in Spanish Quixote, x in Russian (khah)

SJ = sh in shirt

TSJ = ch in church

ZJ = z in azure, s in treasure

DZJ = j in jail, g in age

NG = ng in sing

Δ (Greek Delta) = th in then

Θ (Greek Theta) = th in thin

Abbreviation Key

(rt) = transcribed at real-time

(75%) = transcribed at a speed other than 50%

(h) = human vocalization

(1-2m) = one or two words or syllables are missing or inaudible here

(int) = interrogative inflection

(dr) = Inflected as a direct response

(imp) = imperative inflection

(w) = whispered

(q) = very low audibility, quiet, almost imperceptible at normal speeds

(im) = human imitating a creature

(ma) = possible male Sasquatch Being

(fe) = possible female Sasquatch Being

(ju) = possible juvenile Sasquatch Being

(G) = grunt, growl or grumble, possible language

(W) = whistle or squeak, possible language

(SN) = snarl, possible language

(SC) = scream, possible language

(TP5) = tooth pop, number in sequence, possible language, not evident in BMT

(WK3) = wood knock, number in sequence, possible language

(RK4) = rock knock, number in sequences, possible language

BERRY TAPE I

Transcribed by R. Scott Nelson

Time Utterance

0:4.5 (W) (W)

0:8.62 (W) (W) (W)

0:15.11 RAM HO BÄ RÜ KHÄ HÜ

0:16.70 WAM VO HÜ KHÖ KHU′

0:17.52 NÖ U PLÄ MEN TI KHU

0:18.82 NÄR LÄ

0:20.21 NA GÖ KÜ STEP GÄ KÜ BLEM

0:21.25 Ü KÜ DZJÄ

0:21.76 FRrÄP E KHÜK LE

0:22.65 ÜN Ï KÜ O GÜ AKH (int)

0:23.85 DÖ WÄÏ NÖ (dr)

0:24.52 MÜ Ï FWI KÖ PÏ KHU′ SJ΄

0:31.43 (ma) HU Ö NÖ> KHÄ HÜ

0:32.95 PLEN DÜTSJ TISJ

0:33.61 SÏ DZJAÖ GLÖ PÜ MËKH

0:34.90 PÄ KHÏ KÖ DÜ TÜ SEKSÏ

0:35.88 WA HEP DÜ TSJE DÜ FU HEP

0:36.95 (ma) FI KÜ ÄÏ> KHÜ′

0:44.80 FÄ LIP ÄBÄSJ KHU′

0:45.03 NE VER GÖ ΄ ÖM KHU′

0:47.03 FÖ WÄ Ï>

0:48.08 WA KHU΄ KVÄM

0:49.16 ITS KÄÏM VÄR US FO RI ZIS TENS

0:51.27 MÖ> FER BÏ KEN JÄ Ä VÄÖN SÏ RYK MI RO GHAP –

GÏ GO WYP

0:53.66 MÏ WÄTSJ FYD PLËN FYD NÜ AÖ> KHE KHU′

0:55.34 NÖ ÄÏ ÄKHSJ HÜ

0:57.13 (h) Come on, boy.

0:58.04 (h) Come on, let’s eat.

1:00.93 BÏ KAER FYL NAÖ PRÖS GYD

    1. NÖÄ Ö JA LET KHE
    1. MÖÏ PISJ FE KHE KHU′

(h) Come on.

1:11.58 KHU BEK

1:12.63 KHËÄ KHU′

1:13.77 Ä LÄF

1:14.46 MÖ VE KHÜ

1:14.86 LAF KHU′

1:15.35 NÖ KHÏÄ

1:16.01 KHÖ VË ÄER ZÏ RÄ KIL WÄ KÜ ′ÜSJ

1:17.49 BÜ GÄ TÄÏSJ KHU′

Bilby-Phillips Gamecam Photo, Part 3 – Final Thoughts

Dr. Anthony Ciani

For my take of the UHS subject, it is probably a uniform color, although the
pixels in the scan are about the width any camo pattern would have, which
could blur the pattern across pixels, but not by much.  The transparency
slide I saw appeared to have no patterning at all, and looked uniform.  I
tried searching through some camo patterns in a couple of catalogs, and
there were none which had that overall dark gray color. Almost every pattern
possessed high contrasts, and very few had colors different from greens and
earth tones, usually being blues.  The only "gray" camo patterns were
digital camos, like those used in ACUs, which are light in color. The color
is very much a dark color, likely a gray, possibly a slightly silvery
black, but not the jet black used in clothing.

The raised foot appears to be bare.  There appears to be nothing covering the
face, and the area around the face looks to be a lighter color, but still
grayish and dark.

After studying the slide and high-res scans, it seems that the UHS itself is
a dark color.  The coloration of leaves hanging behind the UHS is visible,
particularly red-orange tints.  The scene lacks much in the way of green and
blue objects.  If the UHS had color, the flash appears to have been sufficient
to show it.

The UHS appears to be carrying another UHS, but this could be a trick due to
a color variation on the UHS object itself.  Still, the right arm appears to
be beneath the second UHS, supporting it.

The sources of the bright spots are still unclear, but may be due to dust
adhering to the film, possibly during processing.  These could also have been
dust particles nearer to the camera when the picture was taken, although they
do seem to be on the UHS.

As for being a human, outside of a costume, the face appears to have
characteristics which are outside normal human traits.  The eyes are visible
and appear large and dark.  The nose also appears to have rather large nostrils.
There is enough clarity to make comparisons of anatomic ratios.  The legs are
too short, comprising about 40% of the total height. A human leg should be 50%,
or a little more.  The arms are too long.  If relaxed at the sides, the tip of
the fist would be midway between the crotch and the knee.  A human fist should
be close to the crotch.  The total length of the arm and fist is approximately
the same as the length of the leg from the hip.  The humerus to femur ratio is
approximately 1.1:1, a human should be 0.7:1.  The femur to tibia ratio is
difficult to determine, but may be 1.2:1, which is consistent across humans and
all of the great apes (although gorillas and orangs tend to have slightly longer
femurs).  If the subject were 5'6" tall, then the shoulders would be 27 inches
across.  The hips also seem wide for a human, but could be on the upper end for
human females.  If this is a human, it is a very deformed one.  The ratios are
consistent with "less evolved" apes.

As for being a hoax.  This does present a possibility, although difficult. To
obtain the ratios measured in the image, the head of the actor would need to be
beneath the head of the costume, between the large "trapezium" muscles.  The
shoulder width is fully outside a human capability, so the arms would be entirely
prosthetic, with the actor's arms inside the torso. The hips would likely have
require padding.  The feet would be simple to do up.  The figure is clearly not
in a stable position, and so must have been walking (or anchored).

It is also possible that this is a mannequin, a construction, which is easier to
build for a still photo than a complicated costume.  I was furnished with a
Picture CD that contained all of the pictures from that film strip.  There were
25 images (typical for a 24 exposure strip), and they seemed to be in order, in
sets of 4, as is typical of 35mm film.  The image with the UHS was at the
beginning of a strip. Unless they were conveniently cut at a boundary, or the
camera deactivated, there were no images of someone setting up a mannequin.
There were images from the camera being setup and removed (it was relocated at
one point), but not every time. Also, at some point, an additional game camera
was added in the view of the first (it can be seen on a tree to the right of the
UHS). No pictures were taken of that camera being setup.  That second camera did
take some pictures, but failed to advance the film properly.  So a mannequin
could have been setup, without any pictures of it, either by the owners
deactivating the camera, or by hoaxers who stayed out of sensor range.

As for being an unclassified ape species.  No problem, if you will allow yourself
to accept that such a thing has remained hidden from scientists, or scientists
have been obtuse to its existence, for such a long time. Although, if you
consider that such a thing only remained hidden from science for about 100 years
mid 1850's until 1967), then it does not seem all that implausible, as there are
species which evaded the hunter's bullet during several hundred years of
exploration, on all continents. That such an animal remained hidden [from science]
for 100 years seems an unimpressive feat.  That science has chosen to ignore it
for over 40 years, is truly disturbing.  I may prefer the idea of a hoax, lest
science be shamed.

Idaho – 48 in ‘08

Idaho was my fifteenth stop squatchin’ in all statess and provinces. I was invited to go squatchin’ with John, a local researcher in Northern Idaho.

A possible tree twist/break at about the 6 feet level.

A possible 10 inch print.

On the 19th of June, 2010 we camped in the mountains of Northern Idaho. John shares his experiences since researching in this area since 2002.

Thanks for allowing me to tag along John!

To listen to a complete audio recording of this segment click here:
Idaho – 48 in ‘08

Are you interested in being part of this project?

“You don’t shoot Mongo. You make Mongo mad.”

Recently I searched through a lot of newspaper articles for the state of Illinois in reference to bigfoot / sasquatch sightings. The county with the most reports is Jackson County and includes at least thirty articles.

The thirty articles can be read at Illinois Bigfoot Media Reports.

Something that caught my eye while going through these articles was the statement made by the Chicago Tribune in  Bigfoot believers – what do they believe? that “the “Mud Monster” — which was also nicknamed “Mongo,” by some locals.”  The Tribune referenced three previous articles:

Muddy Monster Returns – Group reports Murphysboro encounter – June 1988

A Monster of an Idea to Boost Tourism – October 30, 2003

Haunted Southern Illinois: Region full of the scary, bizarre, and freaky phenomena – October 30, 2004

Each of these articles did repeat the “Mongo” statement.  What I thought odd was that the statement is a famous line out of the movie Blazing Saddles, the very popular movie directed by Mel Brooks that was released in 1974.

The character Jim ( portrayed by Gene Wilder) tells Bart, the sheriff (portrayed by Cleavon Little) as he is strapping on his gun while referencing Mongo (portrayed by Alex Karras):

“No, no, don’t do that, don’t do that. If you shoot him, you’ll just make him mad.”  This scene can be viewed on YouTube: Blazing Saddles – Mongo

However the sightings of the “Murphysboro Big Muddy Monster” started in July of 1973, a whole year before the movie Blazing Saddles was released.  The first reference that I can find using the term “Mongo” is fourteen years after the rash of sightings in the early ’70’s.  What I am implying is that the later articles added a well known phrase out of a popular movie but not something that the people of Murphysboro used in their conversations about the “Monster”.

Telinga Parabolic Microphone

My Telinga Parabolic Microphone, with Pro 7 handle and Dat stereo mic finally arrived from Sweden.

I had previously tried out this system in Seattle in April at the Annual Nature recording Workshop presented by Naturesound.org.

Parabolic microphones have been used for years when recording species specific. I have high hopes for this new microphone when combined with the Sound Designs 7XX series of very high quality field recorders.

My first recording was of a Song Sparrow.  The background sound is of wind in the tree tops.

(from a previous photo)


Central Illinois man on watch for Bigfoot

I recently gave a short interview to our local newspaper.

http://www.sj-r.com/top-stories/x514811886/Dave-Bakke-Central-Illinois-man-on-watch-for-Bigfoot

Dave Bakke: Central Illinois man on watch for Bigfoot


Posted May 29, 2010 @ 11:30 PM
Last update May 30, 2010 @ 08:10 AM

Some of you will think Stan Courtney is wasting his time. Others of you will think Stan is onto something. Your reaction depends on how you feel about Bigfoot (Sasquatch, if you prefer).

Stan is central Illinois’ foremost expert on the legendary (mythical?) man-beast. Stan’s website – www.stancourtney.com — contains an exhaustive record of Illinois Bigfoot reports dating from 2009 all the way back to 1883.

For 35 years, Stan lived in Pawnee and worked at St. John’s Hospital in Springfield. He has retired and is living, well, all he’ll say is that it is “south of Springfield.”

“I don’t want other researchers invading my territory,” he explains. There isn’t much chance of that, since Bigfoot researchers appear to be on the sparse side. Be that as it may, Stan says his Bigfoot interest began when he was a boy in his native Idaho.

“I heard stories, read newspaper articles, when I was a kid about him,” Stan says. “I had relatives who had contact and had seen him.”

Since then, Stan’s interest has grown into an avocation. Stan has spent nights out in the woods, listening and recording weird, unexplained sounds (you can hear them for yourself at his website, along with more conventional outdoor recordings).

“I’ve interviewed over 200 witnesses who’ve seen (Bigfoot),” Stan says. “I literally know hundreds of people who’ve seen these animals. There have been lots of them in central Illinois. I’ve recorded lots of sounds that other researchers and witnesses believe come from these animals. People in Springfield don’t realize it, but there have been a lot of reports from the Sangamon River around Riverton.”

Already, I can hear the scoffing. Go ahead. Stan’s used to it. It must, I told him, be like the UFO sightings. There have been thousands of reports of UFOs, but most people still dismiss the idea. Mere weather balloons. Meteorites. The aurora borealis. Airplanes. Lightning.

Here is a report Stan documents concerning a Nov. 8, 2008, sighting in Macoupin County: “I recently moved out of my house in Girard, IL. During the last year or so I have experienced several strange occurrences.

“I have never actually seen anything except once a large dark shape moving bipedally through the heavy fog. I have heard the sound of something drumming on tree trunks. The sound of something BIG walking in the woods, on 2 legs. I have found chunks of firewood thrown from my wood pile. And on November 25 of 2008, as I was packing to move I heard a moaning howl very close to the house. I have hunted for 20 years and I have NEVER heard the likes of this.

“I stopped loading the vehicle, loaded my .45 and locked the door. I did the rest of my packing the next two nights armed but as before I had the distinct feeling I was being watched and several times large branches were broken, and there was knocking on trees.

“Also there is an area of the woods where the grass and foliage is crushed down. This could be deer, but since these things have started occurring, the deer, who are usually thick as fleas have been gone.”

The witness isn’t named, which is not unusual for these reports of contact.

“There’s a lot of ridicule that goes along with this,” Stan says. “That kind of puts a damper on getting reports.”

Stan is open about his belief in Bigfoot. He says he’s too old to give a darn what people think.

“Maybe I would if I was 25 years old and starting a career where it might affect me,” he says. “A lot of people who are in the field might own a business and don’t want their customers to know. The other side of it is people don’t care who knows it.”

You have to admit, this is a fascinating hobby. Stan has been a member of the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (http://bfro.net) since 2004.

One of these days, he says, someone is going to find a dead Bigfoot carcass or one will be hit by a semi on the highway. Then all debate will be over.

Until then, Stan will be out there somewhere, probably in a lonely, remote place in Illinois, recorder in hand — waiting.

Everybody has a story. The problem is that some of them are boring. If yours is not, contact Dave Bakke at 788-1541 or dave.bakke@sj-r.com. His column appears Wednesday, Friday and Sunday. To read more, visit www.sj-r.com/bakke.

That Weird Sound

One aspect of leaving unattended recorders running continuously in the woods is recording very unusual and bizarre sounds. Two years in a row now I have recorded odd animals that no one has been able to adequately identify.

Around the 5th of May, 2010 I recorded this new sound. It was recorded using a Samson H-2 recorder and a small remote microphone.  The location was in a lightly wooded oak and hickory forest here in Central Illinois. It was several hundred yards from the nearest creek and also about 30 feet from a country road.

Here is the sound:

That Weird Sound

http://www.stancourtney.com/sounds/insects/2010.05.07._Insect.mp3

It was suggested that I contact the Illinois State Museum in Springfield, Illinois. I sent them the sound clip and got the following response.

“Dave Bohlen (ornithologist), Dr. Meredith Mahoney (herpetologist) and I [Tim Cashatt] (entomologist) listened to your recording and could not identify the sound.”

The internet is a wonderful resource and I posted it both on naturerecordists, which is a Yahoo Group made up hundreds of folks interested in recording the sounds of nature, and also on my Facebook account.

I received many responses ranging from cicadas to frogs.

If anyone has a suggestion please leave a comment.

Bilby-Phillips Gamecam Photo, Part 2 – Analysis by Dr. Anthony Ciani

Stan – Dr.Ciani contacted me by email and offered to evaluate the original
digital copy. At that time I obtained from Phillips – Bilby an untouched
copy. Below is his analysis of the Gamecam Photo, originally posted
here on the 19th of April, 2010. And then below that is Dr.Ciani’s analysis
of the untouched copy.

Anthony Ciani, PhD (aciani1@uic.edu)
Condensed Matter Physicist
http://wolfgang.phy.uic.edu/~tony

(Dr.Ciani’s thoughts on the posted photo of Gamecam Photo
of 19th of April, 2010.)

After reading this and seeing the original scan, it became clear what that
person did. He tried to apply a sharpen or deconvolution filter to a
heavily noisy image, which was already in focus. The result is that it
creates a moire pattern, which hides detail. He then “cut” around the
figure, and applied some type of level adjustment (probably a gamma
filter) to attempt to brighten the subject. The end result was a low
quality, distorted image, which appeared to be doctored.

[Stan - the original non-enhanced photo. For large scale image click link]

http://www.stancourtney.com/photo/untouched_large.jpg

(Dr.Ciani was supplied with the above untouched original photo which
he then enhanced himself. What follows is Dr.Ciani’s analysis of that
original photo of which Dr.Ciani enhanced himself and is posted below in
both small and full scale.)

My analysis of the photo:

The digital image purports to be a scan from a developed photographic
film, used in a game camera. The type of film is unidentified. The image
contains EXIF data indicating it was made by a Noritsu Koki QSS-32_33, and
saved by Noritsu’s image software. EXIF data can be faked; however, there
are no indications that the image has been altered in any way, post scan.
The Noritsu Koki QSS-32_33 is a low volume film processor, and the image
was probably made directly from the negative; although the QSS-32_33 can
scan images from prints. For simplicity, the term “film” will be used to
refer to the scanned original, and “image” will be used to refer to the
digital data.

The game camera (model unknown) is a flash photography model. The
object of interest, hence forth referred to as unidentified humanoid shape
(UHS), is just within the range of the flash, and is approximately as
dark as the surrounding vegetation, and similarly hued. The intensity
values in the image span almost the entire range, but there is no true
black present in the image, which reduces the likelihood that there has
been alteration of the image. UHS is within a darker region of the
picture, and being dark itself, there is a substantial amount of dithering
over UHS. This is typical when scanning dark areas, as noise in the
electronic sensors becomes equivalent to the signal.

UHS appears to be a real object in the film. The camera flash and lens
are not coaxial, which allows the lens to see shadows caused by the flash.
These shadows should be offset in the same direction which the lens is
offset from the flash. In this case, the lens would be below the flash.
The distance between the shadow and the casting object should decrease as
the object rises above the horizon. The shadows being cast on UHS
appear to be consistent with this. UHS is also clearly in front of
some limbs and trees in the background, which pass behind UHS. There is
no indication of UHS being anything other than a real object in the scene,
and there is no indication that any part of the scene is a composite
image.

There is a substantial amount of noise around UHS, which can cause
some details to become difficult to identify. Unfortunately, noise
covers detail, and removing one removes the other.

[Stan - Dr.Ciani's enhancement - For large scale image click link]

http://wolfgang.phy.uic.edu/~tony/bilby_enh.jpg

The above enhanced image has undergone several processing steps to remove
noise (which adds blur), and then enhance the edges. This process was
performed in the following manner. The image was copied into a new
layer, and the color space was reduced to gray scale. A filter was applied
to erode dark pixels. This filter increases the intensity of a pixel if
it is of lower intensity than its neighbors. The effect is to remove
noise over the lighter areas, identifying solid objects. The filter was
applied with a 25% level (75% original gray scale, 25% filtered gray scale).
A second gray scale layer was then enhanced using a difference of
Guassians, to bring out edge detail, which created a light map, used
to highlight continuous regions. The edge enhanced layer was then
combined with the filtered layer to produce a light map which highlighted
the branches and UHS. This light map was then applied to the original
layer, to brighten the key objects. The result brings out the form of UHS
and the trees, but removes the appearance of texture from those objects.
In reality, it was the noise which destroyed the texture.

There is a caveat as well. If the noise is strong enough, this process
can highlight objects which never existed. The only region with strong
enough noise for this to occur is the area around or above the head of
UHS. In the enhanced image, it appears UHS may have a highly domed head.
This may be a result of the filter highlighting a random “pattern” in the
noise, essentially, digitally enhancing pareidolia. The general form of
UHS is certain. The noise is too low for pareidolia.

A scan of the film using higher exposure settings may provide additional
detail for the dark regions of the film, while destroying detail in the
empty area illuminated by the flash. Some of the noise may also be
due to film grain, depending on the ASA speed and model of film. The
limiting information seems to be pixelation, more than noise or film
grain. The film should contain more information than this, and a higher
resolution scan should yield significantly better detail. Even better if
multiple, high resolution scans are averaged together, to remove noise.

Stan – Original untouched photo on left, Dr.Ciani’s enhancement on right.

The UHS object itself is interesting. There are three bright points on
its figure. Two near the knees, and one between the left elbow and body.
These might be reflective materials (e.g. mica), bare metal, or brightly
colored objects. The two lower spots are very likely flecks of material.
The object under the arm is different, and clearly being carried, with
the left hand wrapped around it. It is also not a single bright point,
and some details can be identified. The object is oval in general shape,
darker than UHS, and may have color, perhaps blue or green. The bright
spot is roughly in the center of the object, and is not perfectly round.
The bright spot seems to have a darker spot in its middle. In this case,
pixelation is the limiting factor, the noise is not substantial.
Overall, the image appears to be an unaltered scan from a film processing
unit. The film is likely a picture of a real scene. The limiting factors
pertaining to detail in the image are the scan resolution, followed by the
exposure level. It is suggested that the film be taken to a professional
photographic shop, where it can be scanned using a higher end film
scanner, perhaps with an optical resolution of 4000 dpi or higher. Film
scanners with optical resolutions of 7200 dpi exist, and would be best.
Ideally, a scanner with an adjustable exposure level or high dynamic
range should be used to intensify the dark areas. Film is analogue, and
so, such an optical intensification should produce a better scan.

Portable Sound Recorder Overview Charts

I receive many requests for recommendations about recorders. As everyone’s interest and budget is different it is not an easy question to answer. I wrote a series of six articles to at least attempt to guide individuals towards a system that will be of benefit to them.

For my recommendations within each price bracket please see: Field Recorders

I was able to find 8 sites that have exhaustive comparison charts of small field recorders.

1. Sweetwater Comparison Chart

2. Wingfield Audio Comparison Chart

3. Studio Spares Forum Comparison Chart

4. Transom tools column

5. Liberman Sound

6. Corporate Talk Radio

7. Avisoft Biocoustics